Deciphering digital inclusion: exploring its relationship with digital literacy and other related variables
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46734/revcientifica.v7i1.96Keywords:
digital inclusion, digital literacy, digital competence, higher levelAbstract
PROBLEM: In today's digital age, digital literacy is key to participation in society and education. This study explores how digital literacy and related variables are connected to digital inclusion. OBJECTIVE: To establish the relationship between digital literacy and other related variables with the digital inclusion of a group of master’s level students. METHOD: The study was conducted within the postpositivist paradigm and a quantitative approach, using a correlational, cross-sectional, non-experimental design. An online survey was used as the data collection instrument, and the sample consisted of 35 university students selected through non-probabilistic voluntary sampling. RESULTS: In the final model, the following variables were significant at an alpha level of 5%: number of completed ICT trainings of less than forty hours, knowledge of cybercrimes, knowledge of security protocols, and Digital Literacy, with a correlation coefficient of R=0.843, R²=0.711, and adjusted R²=0.673. The average Digital Inclusion index was 0.46, with 0.48 for women and 0.45 for men. The Digital Literacy index averaged 0.45, decreasing slightly to 0.44 for women and remaining at 0.45 for men. Regarding digital competence, the overall average was 0.41, with 0.40 for usage and 0.43 for knowledge. CONCLUSION: digital literacy is directly related to digital inclusion, with a coefficient of β4=0.152, which was significant at the 5% level. This indicates that a one-unit change in digital literacy results in a proportional change of 0.152 units in digital inclusion, suggesting that a higher level of digital literacy among students is positively associated with a higher level of digital inclusion.
Downloads
References
Agustín, M., & Clavero, M. (2010). Indicadores sociales de inclusión digital:brecha y Participación ciudadana. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza. http://eprints.rclis.org/14264/1/Indicadores_brecha.pdf
Arion, F., Harutyunyan , G., Aleksanyan, V., Muradyan, M., Asatryan, H., & Manucharyan, M. (2024). Determining Digitalization Issues (ICT Adoption, Digital Literacy, and the Digital Divide) in Rural Areas by Using Sample Surveys: The Case of Armenia. Agriculture, 14(249), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020249
Dornaleteche, J., Buitrago, A., & Moreno, L. (2015). Categorización, selección de ítems y aplicación del test de alfabetización digital online como indicador de la competencia mediática. Comunicar, 22(44), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-19
European Comission. (2010). Digital Literacy European:Digital Literacy European Commission Working Paper and Recommendations from Digital Literacy High-Level Expert Group. Europa. https://www.ifap.ru/library/book386.pdf
Kaeophanuek, S., Na-Songkhla, J., & Nilsook, P. (2018). How to Enhance Digital Literacy Skills among Information Sciences Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(4), 1-6. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.4.1050
López, P., & Samek, Y. (2009). Inclusión digital:. Dossier ieducaclon y biblioteca, (172),114-118. https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/119650/EB21_N172_P114-118.pdf;jsessionid=628BEAC107E01A9CC21DFEF73D3E3B99?sequence=1
Murray, M., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 85-100. https://iisit.org/Vol11/IISITv11p085-100Murray0507.pdf
Reddy, P., Chaudhary , K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
Rangel, A., & Peñalosa, E. (2013). Alfabetización digital en docentes de educación superior: construcción y prueba empírica de un instrumento de evaluación. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación(43), 9-23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2013.i43.01
Robinson, J., DiMaggop, P., & Hargittai, E. (2003). New Social Survey Perspectives on the Digital divide. IT&SOCIETY, 1(5), 1-22.
http://www.webuse.org/pdf/RobinsonEtALNewSocialSurveyPerspectives2003.pdf
Sadayan, M., & Koteswara, R. (2017). Digital Inclusion Index: A Measurement of ICT Advancements in Bahrain & GCC. International Journal of Computing and Network Technology, 5(2), 59-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/IJCNT/050203
Thomas, J., McCosker,, A., Parkinson, S., Hegarty, K., Featherstone, D., Kennedy, J. y Ganley, L. (2023). Measuring Australia’s Digital Divide: Australian Digital Inclusion Index: 2023. Melbourne: ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, RMIT University, Swinburne University of Technology, and Telstra. DOI: 10.25916/528s-ny91
Tourón, J., Martín, D., Navarro, E., Pradas, S., & Íñigo, V. (2018). Validación de constructo de un instrumento para medir la competencia digital docente de los profesores (CDD). Revista española de pedagogía(269), 25-54. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP76-1-2018-02
Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T., & Fu, Y. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of survey Methodology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ingrid Lucrecia Buch Gómez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons 4.0, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a compartir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo: en repositorios institucionales o páginas web personales) antes y durante el proceso de envío del manuscrito, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos, a una mayor y más rápida citación del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).